Ruling on Witr

حكم صلاة الوتر

Sunni jurists agree that Witr is strongly emphasised. The Hanafi school classes it as wajib (necessary), a category between fard and sunnah, while the Maliki, Shafi'i and Hanbali schools class it as an emphasised sunnah.

Sources are sorted by whether they agree with this statement:

Witr is obligatory (wajib).

Sources that agree with the statement above.

Witr as Wajib: The Hanafi Position
Islamic Academy (sample data)2026article

The article argues that Witr is wajib, following Abu Hanifa.

Conditions: 'Wajib' is used in the Hanafi technical sense — binding but below fard; denying it is not disbelief.; Abu Yusuf and Muhammad al-Shaybani held it to be a sunnah.

Evidence these sources use, and the objections to it

Evidence, and who relies on itHow scholars assess it for this question

Sunan Abi Dawud 1419

Witr is a duty (haqq); whoever does not observe Witr is not of us.

Supporting Witr as Wajib: The Hanafi Position: The word 'duty' (haqq) is read as indicating obligation.

No scholar's assessment of this evidence has been recorded yet.

Sunan Abi Dawud 1422

Witr is a duty (haqq) upon every Muslim; whoever wishes to pray five, let him do so; whoever wishes to pray three, let him do so; and whoever wishes to pray one, let him do so.

Supporting Witr as Wajib: The Hanafi Position: Cited for the word 'duty' (haqq).

No scholar's assessment of this evidence has been recorded yet.

Scholars these sources quote

الوتر واجب عند أبي حنيفة رحمه الله، وقالا: سنةWitr is obligatory (wajib) according to Abu Hanifa, while the two [Abu Yusuf and Muhammad] said: it is a sunnah.
Burhan al-Din al-Marghinani, al-Hidayah fi Sharh Bidayat al-Mubtadi
The scholar's own view on this: Supporting
Quoted in Witr as Wajib: The Hanafi Position: Establishes Abu Hanifa's position as the school's authoritative view.